The truth is that competitive proposals have three elements:
A good idea. The novel research you intend to deliver needs to include a robust methodology and be genuinely feasible. Reviewers recognise that success is never guaranteed, but they need to have confidence that your project will deliver something of value if it is funded.
Clear communication. A proposal must be understandable to the reviewer. The need for the research and the difference it will make in the world if the research is successful must be clearly articulated. Reviewers aren’t mind readers and a grant proposal isn’t an IQ test: straightforward language will always trump overly complex or convoluted writing.
Understanding of the funding system. It is your responsibility to understand what each funder and funding scheme you apply for requires. It is necessary to get comfortable investigating the funder’s strategy and the reviewer guidance as well as ensuring that you’ve followed all of the funder’s instructions.
Nothing can guarantee a successfully funded project. But recognising the gaps you have and identifying the actions you can take to fill them will bring you closer to the finish line.
See all of the general funding myths ...
- MYTH #1: The only thing you need for a successful proposal is a good idea
- MYTH #2: You are writing a proposal for yourself
- MYTH #3: Guidance documents are optional
- MYTH #4: All proposals should be treated in the same way
- MYTH #5: The funder decides who gets funded
- MYTH #6: The 1-6 score on the review determines how a proposal does at panel
- MYTH #7: A competitive proposal can be written in a weekend / It takes years to write a competitive proposal
- MYTH #8: Copying what successful proposals have done gives you a better chance of getting funding
- MYTH #9: Grand proclamations are a great way to get your research noticed
- MYTH #10: Repeating parts of your proposal is fine
- MYTH #11: Reviewers are chosen at random
- MYTH #12: You can’t ask for any help when writing a grant proposal